Medical altruism in mainstream health economics: theoretical and political paradoxes

Abstract : In the field of healthcare, ethical considerations are omnipresent. The problem is that it is not clear how to introduce professional ethics within the frontiers demarcated by economic rationality. In mainstream economics, medical altruism is defined as the inclusion of the patient’s welfare in the doctor’s utility function. This definition presents two serious problems that we develop in this paper. The first problem is that mainstream theory does not propose a model of authentic altruism because it reduces otherness to a source of utility like any other. The second problemis that ethical and altruistic (instrumental or otherwise) behaviour should not be conflated. By reducing ethics to altruism, mainstream theory prevents any genuine discussion of medical ethics. Then, the thesis of the paper is that the attempt tointroduce altruism into the standard framework creates theoretical paradoxes that create policy dilemmas
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [59 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-univ-paris10.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01385938
Contributor : Administrateur Hal Nanterre <>
Submitted on : Saturday, October 5, 2019 - 6:12:03 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, October 9, 2019 - 1:28:56 AM

File

Da Silva et Batifoulier (2014)...
Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Philippe Batifoulier, Nicolas da Silva. Medical altruism in mainstream health economics: theoretical and political paradoxes. Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2014, 72 (3), pp.261 - 279. ⟨10.1080/00346764.2014.927727⟩. ⟨hal-01385938⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

150

Files downloads

34