Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Variability of creativity judgments

Abstract : The Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT), developed by Amabile [Amabile, T.M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013], is frequently used to evaluate the creativity of productions. Judgments obtained with CAT are usually reliable and valid. However, notable individual differences in judgment exist. This empirical study shows that creativity judgments for advertisements vary, depending on (1) the level of two underlying components of creativity — originality and appropriateness, (2) the creative ability of the judges, i.e. variations in their ability to be original, and finally, (3) instructions or training that they received about the topic of creativity assessment. Effects of advertisements' appropriateness and judges' ability to be original on individual differences in creativity judgments are discussed.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [30 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-univ-paris10.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01392485
Contributor : Maud Besancon <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, November 9, 2016 - 12:10:29 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, October 14, 2020 - 4:01:58 AM

Identifiers

Citation

Xavier Caroff, Maud Besançon. Variability of creativity judgments. Learning and Individual Differences, Elsevier, 2008, 18, pp.367 - 371. ⟨10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.001⟩. ⟨hal-01392485⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

451