A. Berdicevskis, Using Universal Dependencies in cross-linguistic complexity research, Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Universal Dependencies, pp.8-17, 2018.

R. Ferrer-i-cancho, Why do syntactic links not cross?, Europhysics Letters), vol.76, pp.1228-1234, 2006.

N. Cowan, The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity, Behavioral and brain sciences, vol.24, issue.1, pp.87-114, 2001.

N. Cowan, The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why?. Current directions in psychological science, vol.19, pp.51-57, 2010.

D. Angela and . Friederici, The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function, Physiological reviews, vol.91, issue.4, pp.1357-1392, 2011.

L. Frazier and F. Dean, The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model, Cognition, vol.6, issue.4, pp.291-325, 1978.

R. Futrell, K. Mahowald, and E. Gibson, Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.112, issue.33, pp.10336-10341, 2015.

E. Gibson, Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies, Cognition, vol.68, issue.1, pp.1-76, 1998.

E. Gibson, The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. Image, language, brain, pp.95-126, 2000.

D. Gildea and D. Temperley, Do grammars minimize dependency length?, Cognitive Science, vol.34, issue.2, pp.286-310, 2010.

A. Sylvain-kahane, O. Nasr, and . Rambow, Pseudo-projectivity: a polynomially parsable non-projective dependency grammar, The 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol.1, 1998.

C. Sylvain-kahane, M. Yan, and . Botalla, What are the limitations on the flux of syntactic dependencies? Evidence from UD treebanks, 4th international conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling), pp.73-82, 2017.

L. Richard and . Lewis, Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing, Journal of psycholinguistic research, vol.25, issue.1, pp.93-115, 1996.

R. L. Lewis and S. Vasishth, An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval, Cognitive science, vol.29, issue.3, pp.375-419, 2005.

H. Liu, Dependency distance as a metric of language comprehension difficulty, Journal of Cognitive Science, vol.9, issue.2, pp.159-191, 2008.

M. Makuuchi, Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.106, issue.20, pp.8362-8367, 2009.

G. A. Miller and N. Chomsky, Finitary models of language users, 1963.

J. Nivre, An efficient algorithm for projective dependency parsing, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Parsing Technologies, pp.149-160, 2003.

J. Nivre, Constraints on non-projective dependency parsing, 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006.

D. K. Daniel, D. Sleator, and . Temperley, Parsing English with a link grammar, 1995.

D. Temperley and D. Gildea, Minimizing syntactic dependency lengths: typological/cognitive universal, Annual Review of Linguistics, vol.4, pp.67-80, 2018.

H. Victor and . Yngve, A model and an hypothesis for language structure, Proceedings of the American philosophical society, vol.104, pp.444-466, 1960.